Papers, notes and essays from Forticia Research Institute. Every piece states what it claims and what it does not, and shows its sources.
9 of 9 papers
Model errors on related proteins are correlated even at the weakest significant hits. We measure it and what it does to benchmark confidence intervals.
One protein pipeline, 192 runs, one factor changed at a time: seeds dominate, thread and BLAS noise is invisible, and one library release flips a verdict.
In simulation, injected known-bad requests help a fatigued reviewer only above a spare-attention threshold, and recognisable canaries hide the failure.
Simulated approval incidents and a hash-chained log show which fields answer which questions, what defaults cost, and how anchoring sets tamper detection.
In a simulated research pipeline, correlated gates protect up to 18 times less than their pass rates imply, and a one-draw placebo is a coin flip.
In a simulated swarm, sharing falsified ideas saves a third of compute, but neighbourhood rules close off real effects unless records carry their test power.
When may a rejected idea be reopened? Simulated burial and exhumation rules, their false discovery cost, and how the graveyard can audit the court.
A conditional-information measure of rubber-stamping, the defect rate where review rationally collapses, and which levers restore it. A simulation study.